16 June 2008

Another Easy "Success" for MDA

So, the Missile Defense Agency will proclaim another "successful" test of their system if the radar in Juneau picks up a blip of the rocket launched from Kodiak. Proof positive that we are safe from North Korea et al! Keep in mind that all previous "successful intercepts" were not necessarily actual hits - if the interceptor came within 50 miles of the target missile, it was termed a "success".

Mid-July missile launch to test system, no hit planned

Article published on Wednesday, Jun 11th, 2008
By ERIK WANDER
Mirror Writer

It’s all systems go for the upcoming missile launch at the Kodiak Launch Complex in Narrow Cape, but it may prove difficult for residents who want to witness the event.

Alaska Aerospace Development Corp. conducted a tour of its approximately $150-200 million facility for a group from Anchorage on Tuesday. AADC provides services and facilities for the government’s Missile Defense Agency, AADC’s only customer, to conduct test launches.

The launch of the STARS missile will take place in mid-July as part of MDA’s regular training.

In an operation of this type, a missile is launched from Kodiak and destroyed by an interceptor missile launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.

“We are the clay pigeons,” said Dale Nash, CEO of AADC. “The surest way to kill something is to just smash it.”

He said that the target missile launched from Kodiak simulates one coming from Asia or Russia, because such a missile would fly directly over Alaska.

AADC aerospace engineer Shad Combs said a series of such tests, conducted a couple of times a year, has already been completed successfully. They’re now preparing to do another with the hope of building on what has been learned in previous launches.

“We’re making it smarter and smarter and smarter. Every time we do one test, we incorporate our lessons learned into the following test,” Combs said.

The July launch will differ from previous launches, however, because there will be no interceptor missile. It is what Combs referred to as a “target-only launch.”

“It’s going to be an imaginary interception. The interceptor will not launch, but everything will happen except for that,” he said.

The purpose of the non-target mission is to test the instrumentation and systems to make sure they can pick up the incoming missile and predict how they would intercept it.

“It just goes out and it splashes into the ocean. We’re not short for targets, we’re short for interceptors,” Combs said.

Further details of the launch remain sketchy due to the sensitive nature of the classified mission. AADC would say only that it will take place in mid-July. Combs said, however, that a notice to airmen and a notice to fishermen would be released prior to the launch defining restricted areas. AADC will also close the road leading to the facility.

Members of the public will not be able to view the launch up close because of the road closure. Combs said this was not a security measure.

“It’s not for security,” he said. “It’s strictly for safety. The roadblock gives us enough space, so that if something goes wrong with the missile, the population is safe.”

Combs suggested Chiniak as a possible location for those who wish to try to catch a glimpse or take pictures of the launch.

“Other than that, because of the mountains, once it clears the mountains, it’s into the mist, it’s into the clouds,” he said.

Mirror writer Erik Wander can be reached via e-mail at ewander@kodiakdailymirror.com.

05 June 2008

AADC LOBBYING EXPENSES

Alaska Aerospace Development Corp

A special interest’s lobbying activity may go up or down over time, depending on how much attention the federal government is giving their issues. Particularly active clients often retain multiple lobbying firms, each with a team of lobbyists, to press their case for them.

Year:

Total Lobbying Expenditures: $30,000
Subtotal for Parent Alaska Aerospace Development Corp: $30,000

IndustryTotal
Defense Aerospace$30,000
Itemized Lobbying Expenses for Alaska Aerospace Development Corp
Firms HiredTotal Reported by FilerReported Contract Expenses (included in Total Reported by Filer)

Less than $10,000-


$0

Lobbying Expenses Reported by Subsidiary Alaska Aerospace Development Corp
Firms HiredTotal Reported by FilerReported Contract Expenses (included in Total Reported by Filer)
Birch, Horton et al
$10,000
Cohen Group
$20,000